<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Connecting</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sizemore.co.uk/2010/01/20/connecting/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sizemore.co.uk/2010/01/20/connecting/</link>
	<description>I&#039;m not a field agent, I read books</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 18:03:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeffman</title>
		<link>http://www.sizemore.co.uk/2010/01/20/connecting/comment-page-1/#comment-87416</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeffman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 04:08:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sizemore.co.uk/?p=436#comment-87416</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t wish to speak out of turn, but I feel I must answer Martin McCallion&#039;s closing question, as though I don&#039;t agree with your good self (@sizemore) with regards to a lot of Nu-Who, I do echo the sentiment that Russell T Davies treated the audience with contempt on occasion.

Forsaking the final, self-indulgent 20 mins of &#039;The End of Time&#039;, I think that &#039;Love and Monsters&#039;, &#039;Last of the Timelords&quot; and &#039;Partners in Crime&#039; rival Colin Baker&#039;s &#039;Timelash&#039; and Tom Baker&#039;s &#039;The Invisible Enemy&#039; for the worst of Who we&#039;ve ever seen.

Most the Doctor&#039;s have had bad stories throughout its nigh-on 50 years - William Hartnell&#039;s &#039;The Web Planet&#039;, Troughton&#039;s &#039;The Mind Robber&#039;, Davison&#039;s &#039;Warriors of the Deep&#039;, and anything with Sylvester McCoy and Bonnie Langford, highlighting low production values and poor pacing (let&#039;s not mention Paul McGann&#039;s one foray) - but none have treated the audience with contempt to the extent that the first five I mentioned did. (Notice Jon Pertwee gets away scott-free. Although Tom Baker is my favourite Doctor, I think Pertwee has the complete body of work, not a bad story among them)

I digress. &#039;Love and Monsters&#039;  has to rank as one of the worst pieces of television ever to be broadcast (that&#039;s the one where Peter-fucking-Kay thought he was the bigger name than Who). The sheer inanity of it all was embarrassing. &#039;Last of the Timelords&#039;, as in the case of both &#039;Doomsday&#039; and &#039;The End of Time&#039; thought that hitting the reset switch at the end was okay and would leave the viewer joyfully swollen by what had gone before - the return of a horrendously over-acting Master in the first case, Daleks v Cybermen the second, Timelords here today, gone tomorrow, the third - and not of a mind to ask the simplest of questions, such as &quot;hold on, one fucking minute... You virtually destroy mankind, then bring them back, just like that.&quot; 

&quot;Partners in Crime&quot;, with the Adipose? Do me a favour. Doctor Who may still be classed as a kids TV series, but walking fat? How much more condescending can one get?

As I say, these rival the nadir of the classic series - the terminally dull, with the oh-so-convenient-yet-unexplained escape clause of &#039;Timelash, and the giant prawn, &#039;Fantastic Voyage&#039; rip-off of a borefest that even Tom Baker can&#039;t save, &#039;The Invisible Enemy&#039;.

Nu-Who has been brilliant at times, but yes, it has also treated the audience with contempt, almost as though the spectre of Michael Grade was hanging over RTD&#039;s laptop - as it did in the Colin Baker/Sylvester McCoy transition period...

But hey Mike, I don&#039;t wish to tread on your toes here. I should maybe let you have your blog back. 

As there&#039;s little beyond Doctor Who, Spag Westerns, music and my fam I get passionate about, just thought I might throw my own hat into the ring :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t wish to speak out of turn, but I feel I must answer Martin McCallion&#8217;s closing question, as though I don&#8217;t agree with your good self (@sizemore) with regards to a lot of Nu-Who, I do echo the sentiment that Russell T Davies treated the audience with contempt on occasion.</p>
<p>Forsaking the final, self-indulgent 20 mins of &#8216;The End of Time&#8217;, I think that &#8216;Love and Monsters&#8217;, &#8216;Last of the Timelords&#8221; and &#8216;Partners in Crime&#8217; rival Colin Baker&#8217;s &#8216;Timelash&#8217; and Tom Baker&#8217;s &#8216;The Invisible Enemy&#8217; for the worst of Who we&#8217;ve ever seen.</p>
<p>Most the Doctor&#8217;s have had bad stories throughout its nigh-on 50 years &#8211; William Hartnell&#8217;s &#8216;The Web Planet&#8217;, Troughton&#8217;s &#8216;The Mind Robber&#8217;, Davison&#8217;s &#8216;Warriors of the Deep&#8217;, and anything with Sylvester McCoy and Bonnie Langford, highlighting low production values and poor pacing (let&#8217;s not mention Paul McGann&#8217;s one foray) &#8211; but none have treated the audience with contempt to the extent that the first five I mentioned did. (Notice Jon Pertwee gets away scott-free. Although Tom Baker is my favourite Doctor, I think Pertwee has the complete body of work, not a bad story among them)</p>
<p>I digress. &#8216;Love and Monsters&#8217;  has to rank as one of the worst pieces of television ever to be broadcast (that&#8217;s the one where Peter-fucking-Kay thought he was the bigger name than Who). The sheer inanity of it all was embarrassing. &#8216;Last of the Timelords&#8217;, as in the case of both &#8216;Doomsday&#8217; and &#8216;The End of Time&#8217; thought that hitting the reset switch at the end was okay and would leave the viewer joyfully swollen by what had gone before &#8211; the return of a horrendously over-acting Master in the first case, Daleks v Cybermen the second, Timelords here today, gone tomorrow, the third &#8211; and not of a mind to ask the simplest of questions, such as &#8220;hold on, one fucking minute&#8230; You virtually destroy mankind, then bring them back, just like that.&#8221; </p>
<p>&#8220;Partners in Crime&#8221;, with the Adipose? Do me a favour. Doctor Who may still be classed as a kids TV series, but walking fat? How much more condescending can one get?</p>
<p>As I say, these rival the nadir of the classic series &#8211; the terminally dull, with the oh-so-convenient-yet-unexplained escape clause of &#8216;Timelash, and the giant prawn, &#8216;Fantastic Voyage&#8217; rip-off of a borefest that even Tom Baker can&#8217;t save, &#8216;The Invisible Enemy&#8217;.</p>
<p>Nu-Who has been brilliant at times, but yes, it has also treated the audience with contempt, almost as though the spectre of Michael Grade was hanging over RTD&#8217;s laptop &#8211; as it did in the Colin Baker/Sylvester McCoy transition period&#8230;</p>
<p>But hey Mike, I don&#8217;t wish to tread on your toes here. I should maybe let you have your blog back. </p>
<p>As there&#8217;s little beyond Doctor Who, Spag Westerns, music and my fam I get passionate about, just thought I might throw my own hat into the ring <img src='http://www.sizemore.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Stevens</title>
		<link>http://www.sizemore.co.uk/2010/01/20/connecting/comment-page-1/#comment-87397</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Stevens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 10:28:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sizemore.co.uk/?p=436#comment-87397</guid>
		<description>A lovely tribute to Mr Cribbins - a legend indeed.  I thought tennant&#039;s final line was wonderful - &quot;I don&#039;t want to go!!!&quot; - i was crying my eyes out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A lovely tribute to Mr Cribbins &#8211; a legend indeed.  I thought tennant&#8217;s final line was wonderful &#8211; &#8220;I don&#8217;t want to go!!!&#8221; &#8211; i was crying my eyes out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lloyd</title>
		<link>http://www.sizemore.co.uk/2010/01/20/connecting/comment-page-1/#comment-87396</link>
		<dc:creator>Lloyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 09:50:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sizemore.co.uk/?p=436#comment-87396</guid>
		<description>I think something like the content of this post every time I see him.  

Wonderful, wonderfully warm man, vulnerable and very very human.  For me, as well as Jackanory, The Railway Children and The Wombles stand out in particular, but that&#039;s probably because I wanted to be a bit posh.

Good to see you writing more here,  Mike :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think something like the content of this post every time I see him.  </p>
<p>Wonderful, wonderfully warm man, vulnerable and very very human.  For me, as well as Jackanory, The Railway Children and The Wombles stand out in particular, but that&#8217;s probably because I wanted to be a bit posh.</p>
<p>Good to see you writing more here,  Mike <img src='http://www.sizemore.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Croma</title>
		<link>http://www.sizemore.co.uk/2010/01/20/connecting/comment-page-1/#comment-87393</link>
		<dc:creator>Croma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 01:34:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sizemore.co.uk/?p=436#comment-87393</guid>
		<description>Three cheers for Bernard and three cheers to you for a wonderful tribute.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Three cheers for Bernard and three cheers to you for a wonderful tribute.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin McCallion</title>
		<link>http://www.sizemore.co.uk/2010/01/20/connecting/comment-page-1/#comment-87392</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin McCallion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 00:46:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sizemore.co.uk/?p=436#comment-87392</guid>
		<description>I quite agree with you about Bernard Cribbins. I disagree about _Doctor Who_, but that&#039;s just a matter of opinion.

But I think you are mistaken in your footnote.  Certainly, The Doctor complains; but I don&#039;t think it&#039;s cowardly.  It&#039;s a moment of weakness that is startling -- even shocking, because it&#039;s so unlike the character -- but he recovers himself, and carries on as he has to.

I think it&#039;s just that he sees what must happen, and it&#039;s just a pre-echo of his final words: &quot;I don&#039;t want to go.&quot;

He&#039;s not human, but he&#039;s showing humanity (Gallifreyanity, perhaps?)

I&#039;d be interested to know where you think it &quot;treated the audience with contempt&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I quite agree with you about Bernard Cribbins. I disagree about _Doctor Who_, but that&#8217;s just a matter of opinion.</p>
<p>But I think you are mistaken in your footnote.  Certainly, The Doctor complains; but I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s cowardly.  It&#8217;s a moment of weakness that is startling &#8212; even shocking, because it&#8217;s so unlike the character &#8212; but he recovers himself, and carries on as he has to.</p>
<p>I think it&#8217;s just that he sees what must happen, and it&#8217;s just a pre-echo of his final words: &#8220;I don&#8217;t want to go.&#8221;</p>
<p>He&#8217;s not human, but he&#8217;s showing humanity (Gallifreyanity, perhaps?)</p>
<p>I&#8217;d be interested to know where you think it &#8220;treated the audience with contempt&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kristian</title>
		<link>http://www.sizemore.co.uk/2010/01/20/connecting/comment-page-1/#comment-87391</link>
		<dc:creator>Kristian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 00:46:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sizemore.co.uk/?p=436#comment-87391</guid>
		<description>The merits (or lack thereof) of the new Doctor Who were, I believe, the last conversation we actually had face to face. 

Which made it strange when this popped up in my feed, because I was sat here at work, looking out over the harbor in Sydney, sort of talking to people about the end of Who - or more precisely Bernard Cribbins and how no one here knows who he is. Very strange, because as I rattle off a list of the things he has been in people here certainly know his work, just not the man himself connecting the pieces. Hardly surprising given the only TV station worth a damn when I was a kid was the ABC, which certainly felt like it was just a subsidiary o the BBC when I was younger.

I always wonder what (or even how) it is that given the same body of work, people like this can go somewhat unnoticed over here. A also wonder if there is anything in reverse (famous Australian entertains of any kind - something I was about to disparagingly self mock, before remember you&#039;re something of a fan of some of our output here) or, as I somewhat suspect, there is something about the British that allows a personality like this to be culturally identified.

Anyway - very green eyed you got to see this. Which is what I was actually driven to comment and say.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The merits (or lack thereof) of the new Doctor Who were, I believe, the last conversation we actually had face to face. </p>
<p>Which made it strange when this popped up in my feed, because I was sat here at work, looking out over the harbor in Sydney, sort of talking to people about the end of Who &#8211; or more precisely Bernard Cribbins and how no one here knows who he is. Very strange, because as I rattle off a list of the things he has been in people here certainly know his work, just not the man himself connecting the pieces. Hardly surprising given the only TV station worth a damn when I was a kid was the ABC, which certainly felt like it was just a subsidiary o the BBC when I was younger.</p>
<p>I always wonder what (or even how) it is that given the same body of work, people like this can go somewhat unnoticed over here. A also wonder if there is anything in reverse (famous Australian entertains of any kind &#8211; something I was about to disparagingly self mock, before remember you&#8217;re something of a fan of some of our output here) or, as I somewhat suspect, there is something about the British that allows a personality like this to be culturally identified.</p>
<p>Anyway &#8211; very green eyed you got to see this. Which is what I was actually driven to comment and say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
